Pages

Sunday, 13 January 2013

13th January 2013 weekly pool and network statistics


Welcome, miners.

The average network hashrate dipped again this week, despite the increase in MTGOX BTCUS$ price.  Most of the drop that can be attributed to pools was at the now inaccurately named 50BTC.com. Bitparking had a large increase in hashrate this week which puts them in the top 10, ahead of p2Pool.

Bitminter miners started to return this week after the week long DDoS attack the pool suffered.

Pool hopping is still obvious at Slush's pool, but not this week at Deepbit.

The problem with the script for BTCMine is now fixed.




Figure 1: Table of all pools with public data and their various statistics averaged for the last seven days - for smaller pools the average may be more or less than seven days, depending on number of blocks solved for the week. Network hashrate and 50BTC.com hashrate are estimates, the upper and lower 95% confidence interval bounds are included.
Figure 2: Chart of network hashrate, hashrate of the largest mining pool, combined hashrates of the three largest mining pools, and a line representing 50% of the network hashrate. Handy if you're worried about 51% attacks. The upper and lower 95% confidence interval bounds for the network hashrate are in between the shaded areas.
Figure 3: Chart of chronology of pool hashrates, averaged per week.
Figure 4: Chart of average hashrates per pool per round for the week, and per 144 rounds for the network. The upper and lower 95% confidence interval bounds for the network hashrate are in between the shaded areas.
Figure 5: Chart of chronology of negative binomial CDF probability of shares submitted and blocks produced for the week.
Figure 6: Chart of chronology of round length divided by difficulty, averaged per week.
Figure 7: Chart of hashrate vs round length for hoppable pools (the larger the hashrate increase at the start of a round, the larger the loss to strategic miners).
Figure 8: Chart of fulltime miner earnings loss at a proportional pool caused by pool hoppers, expressed as expected PPS earnings for fulltime miners. Currently only for Bitlc and Deepbit. Only valid if strategic pool hopping is actually occurring (see figure 7).  Not included this week.

















Thanks to blockexplorer.com and blockchain.info for use of their network statistics.

Donations help give me the time to analyse bitcoin mining related issues and write these posts. If you enjoy or find them helpful, please consider a small bitcoin donation:

12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are switched off until the current spam storm ends.