0.Introduction
I'd like to remind all readers that these posts are a test of the methods used to create the forecasts, and definitely do not forecast non-MTGOX US$ / BTC price related changes, for example a massive decrease in the cost of a hash. Please do not use the forecasts here for financial forecasts.
The network hashrate for this week is within the 95% confidence interval for error of all models. The future forecasts all indicate a slow but constant rise in the network hashrate in response to the increasing price. However Avalon ASICs have started to arrive, and we can expect the hashrate to increase significantly over the predictions. It may take some time for the models to adjust to the change, if that's at all possible.
1. Models and datasets:
The model datasets have been collected into one paste to save time. Model estimates have been likewise aggregated.
Canary model: An estimate of the current hashrate estimate based only on current price and previous network hashrates. Used to detect changes to the network caused by agents other than the direct action the MTGOX US$ / BTC price as determined by the model.
Models f1, f2, f3 and f4: These are the one, two, three and four week forecasts of the network hashrate, based on the modelled relationship between the MTGOX US$ / BTC and the network hashrate.
2. Results
- Canary model, Models f1, f2, f3 and f4: The network hashrate is still within all models 95% confidence interval lower bound. The one week forecast had 8% error for this week; the others 11% to 14% error. These all would have been useable estimates.
- Difficulty modelling: Errors for this are still large. I may try modelling Difficulty estimates again rather than calculating them from the network hashrate data to see if they're a bit more accurate.
Table 1:
One, two, three and four week forecasts of the weekly average network hashrate, as well as the canary model estimate.
Table 2:
A comparison of the four forecasts and the canary model estimate with the actual network forecast.
Table 3:
One, two and three retarget forecasts for the mining Difficulty at those retargets.
Table 4:
A table of previous retarget date and difficulty estimates, and the actual retarget dates and difficulties as a comparison.
Chart 1:
A graphical history of the one, two, three and four week forecasts of the weekly average network hashrate compared to the actual network weekly average hashrate.
Chart 2:
A graphical history of the Canary model estimates of the weekly average network hashrate compared to the actual network weekly average hashrate.
Chart 3:
A graphical history of the last twenty six weeks of retarget date and difficulty estimates, actual retarget dates and actual difficulties. It should be noted that each retarget will often be forecast by two consecutive weekly forecasts, hence the multiple points per retarget on the new chart.
Donations help give me the time to analyse bitcoin mining related issues and post the results. If you enjoy or find them helpful, please consider a small bitcoin donation:
12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
Thanks to the following for use of their data:
blockexplorer.com: 1Cvvr8AsCfbbVQ2xoWiFD1Gb2VRbGsEf28
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are switched off until the current spam storm ends.